News & Views » Columns

Bashing the bashers

by

comment

News Hits recalls that one of the issues that played prominently in the debate over Michigan’s constitutional ban on gay marriage, which was approved by the state’s voters last November, was whether the amendment would prohibit employers from offering job benefits to their workers’ same-sex partners.

Conservatives assured us that wasn’t the intent of Prop. 2. Liberals warned that such benefits could well be halted if the measure passed. After it did, Republican Attorney General Mike Cox issued an opinion in March stating that the amendment did indeed prevent the City of Kalamazoo from providing domestic partner benefits in future contracts. A lawsuit was filed by gay couples.

Late last month, an Ingham Circuit Court judge ruled that the purpose of the amendment was to bar gay marriages and civil unions. Public employers, the judge said, were allowed to offer same-sex benefits if they wanted.

Which brings us to state Sen. Alan Cropsey (R-DeWitt), who introduced a pair of resolutions urging the Michigan Supreme Court to block state and local governments, and public colleges, from granting such benefits until the court makes a final ruling on the issue. The fact that it isn’t even before the state’s high court seems to have been lost on the good senator and his fellow GOPers. In a 22-16 vote that, the AP reported, went mostly along party lines, the Senate approved two similar resolutions introduced by Cropsey — neither of which have the force of law.

In other words, Cropsey was grandstanding. Or simply just standing — on the necks of gays.

“This marks the latest incident of legislative gay-bashing led by Alan Cropsey,” Jeff Montgomery, head of the Triangle Foundation, said in a press release. “Cropsey, who is obsessed with all things gay, led this latest attack on gay and lesbian families simply for the sport of it, since the resolutions have no authority. The only effect of this mean-spirited action is to bruise and bully gay people.”

On the other end of the issue is state Sen. Gilda Jacobs (D-Huntington Woods), who had this to say: “The supporters of Proposal 2 went out of their way to convince voters that their ‘sanctity of marriage’ agenda was not to take away rights or benefits from people. But that’s exactly what they are trying to do now.”

Send comments to NewsHits@metrotimes.com

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at letters@metrotimes.com.

Detroit Metro Times works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Detroit and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Detroit's true free press free.