A 1997 Supreme Court decision, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, said that public-sector unions could charge and collect fees from non-union members to help defray the cost of collective bargaining and other activities. Non-union members, however, do not have to pay for union political activities in which a union may engage. Janus argued that he was being forced to pay for political activities that he opposed. Actually, non-union members paying “agency” fees are required to sign a letter every year saying they don’t want to be connected to those activities and can get a refund.If the Supreme Court rules in Janus' favor, public sector unions could be weakened, possibly sparking a financial crisis. With less money, unions would lose bargaining power, and thus employers could begin to reduce health-care and post-employment benefits that unions typically bargain for.
We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.
Email us at email@example.com.
Support Local Journalism.
Join the Detroit Metro Times Press Club
Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.
Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.
Join the Metro Times Press Club for as little as $5 a month.