Detroit asks judge to reconsider decision to drop countersuit against anti-police brutality protesters

By

comment
Detroit Will Breathe protesters march in downtown Detroit in June 2020. - STEVE NEAVLING
  • Steve Neavling
  • Detroit Will Breathe protesters march in downtown Detroit in June 2020.

The City of Detroit isn't done with its legal battle against protesters of police brutality and racial injustice.

In a new filing Wednesday, the city is asking a judge to reconsider her decision on March 10 to dismiss its controversial countersuit against Detroit Will Breathe protesters. U.S. District Judge Laurie J. Michelson said the city failed to show that demonstrators conspired to commit acts of violence and vandalism over the summer.



In its motion for reconsideration, the city argues it adequately demonstrated that protesters conspired to assault police officers. The city points to videos of protesters “hurling dangerous projectiles at police officers, blocking busy streets and school buses, encouraging violent behavior, screaming loudly in the faces of DPD officers, refusing to follow clear and lawful DPD directives and destroying and defacing public property.” In addition, the city says that “videos show speakers encouraging violence or endorsing violence against police officers, promoting the destruction and defacing of property, and disrupting the lives of Detroit residents.”

Metro Times attended more than a dozen of the demonstrations. On the few occasions that violence did break out, the city blamed the violence on suburban and out-of-state “outside agitators.”



The city filed the countersuit in response to Detroit Will Breathe’s lawsuit in August that alleged police used unnecessary, excessive force to break up peaceful demonstrations against police brutality.

Jack Schulz, an attorney for the National Lawyers Guild, which filed the lawsuit, said the city presented no new evidence in its latest motion.

“Motions for reconsideration are reserved for when the Court has made a concrete defect in its decision and not to simply present the same argument again. Here, the City is doing the latter,” Schulz told Metro Times in a statement. “It is still unclear what the alleged conspiracy was, who was involved in it, and who was allegedly hurt by it.”

In February, a 36th District Court judge tossed out charges against eight protesters for their roles in the summer demonstrations. On Jan. 14, another 36th District judge dismissed charges against 28 protesters, saying police failed to provide information such as the identities of arresting officers and body cam footage that could be used during a trial. About two weeks later, the city dropped charges against 238 protesters.

Stay on top of Detroit news and views. Sign up for our weekly issue newsletter delivered each Wednesday.

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at letters@metrotimes.com.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Detroit Metro Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Metro Times Press Club for as little as $5 a month.