The Thomas Crown Affair

by

comment

The pleasures of The Thomas Crown Affair are emblematic of what has been lost at the movies in our blockbuster era. This glossy fantasy of immense wealth and even greater sophistication (the two don’t necessarily go hand in hand) is a rarity: a movie about grown-ups who know themselves, what they want and how to get it.

Thomas Crown (Pierce Brosnan) has amassed a fortune from the ability to manipulate situations to his advantage, like a chess player who always beats the computer because his mind can find unexpected moves. He’s also a classic thrill-seeker, who steals a Monet from New York’s Metropolitan Museum.

This impressive art theft brings insurance investigator Catherine Banning (Rene Russo) into his sphere. Catherine uses her formidable sexual charisma as part of her professional arsenal and quickly zeros in on the elusive, attractive Thomas Crown. As successful and emotionally unencumbered as he is, Catherine eyes Thomas as both a potential partner and as prey, a formidable ally or adversary.

Director John McTiernan quickly establishes a cat-and-mouse affair, with self-interest pitted against romance, and competition only fueling Thomas and Catherine’s intense attraction. Bucking the increasingly repulsive May-December trend, Brosnan (46) and Russo (45) are peers, and it shows in their assured, adult sensuality.

The differences between 1967’s Thomas Crown Affair (starring Steve McQueen and Faye Dunaway) are telling, and go beyond the remake’s tastefully explicit sex scenes on (presumably chilly) marble stairs. The original eyed both the crime (bank robbery) and the sexual relationship with a cool detachment, as if money and mating were hopelessly passé.

In the romantic, stock market-fueled 1990s, true love and prosperity are pursued with equal vigor, and The Thomas Crown Affair serves as a nifty blueprint for having your cake and eating it too.

Serena Donadoni writes about film for Metro Times. E-mail her at letters@metrotimes.com.

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at letters@metrotimes.com.

Detroit Metro Times works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Detroit and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Detroit's true free press free.